[v4,4/5] drm/msm: clean up display thread

Submitted by Jeykumar Sankaran on Dec. 7, 2018, 2:41 a.m.

Details

Message ID 1544150504-19630-4-git-send-email-jsanka@codeaurora.org
State New
Series "Series without cover letter"
Headers show

Commit Message

Jeykumar Sankaran Dec. 7, 2018, 2:41 a.m.
Since there are no clients using these threads,
cleaning it up.

changes in v2:
	- switch all the dependent clients to use system wq
	  before removing the disp_threads (Sean Paul)
changes in v3:
	- none
changes in v4:
	- none

Signed-off-by: Jeykumar Sankaran <jsanka@codeaurora.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c | 35 +----------------------------------
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h |  1 -
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 35 deletions(-)

Patch hide | download patch | download mbox

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c
index 37740b8..1e9fec1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c
@@ -286,13 +286,8 @@  static int msm_drm_uninit(struct device *dev)
 		kfree(vbl_ev);
 	}
 
-	/* clean up display commit/event worker threads */
+	/* clean up event worker threads */
 	for (i = 0; i < priv->num_crtcs; i++) {
-		if (priv->disp_thread[i].thread) {
-			kthread_destroy_worker(&priv->disp_thread[i].worker);
-			priv->disp_thread[i].thread = NULL;
-		}
-
 		if (priv->event_thread[i].thread) {
 			kthread_destroy_worker(&priv->event_thread[i].worker);
 			priv->event_thread[i].thread = NULL;
@@ -545,27 +540,6 @@  static int msm_drm_init(struct device *dev, struct drm_driver *drv)
 	 */
 	param.sched_priority = 16;
 	for (i = 0; i < priv->num_crtcs; i++) {
-
-		/* initialize display thread */
-		priv->disp_thread[i].crtc_id = priv->crtcs[i]->base.id;
-		kthread_init_worker(&priv->disp_thread[i].worker);
-		priv->disp_thread[i].dev = ddev;
-		priv->disp_thread[i].thread =
-			kthread_run(kthread_worker_fn,
-				&priv->disp_thread[i].worker,
-				"crtc_commit:%d", priv->disp_thread[i].crtc_id);
-		if (IS_ERR(priv->disp_thread[i].thread)) {
-			DRM_DEV_ERROR(dev, "failed to create crtc_commit kthread\n");
-			priv->disp_thread[i].thread = NULL;
-			goto err_msm_uninit;
-		}
-
-		ret = sched_setscheduler(priv->disp_thread[i].thread,
-					 SCHED_FIFO, &param);
-		if (ret)
-			dev_warn(dev, "disp_thread set priority failed: %d\n",
-				 ret);
-
 		/* initialize event thread */
 		priv->event_thread[i].crtc_id = priv->crtcs[i]->base.id;
 		kthread_init_worker(&priv->event_thread[i].worker);
@@ -580,13 +554,6 @@  static int msm_drm_init(struct device *dev, struct drm_driver *drv)
 			goto err_msm_uninit;
 		}
 
-		/**
-		 * event thread should also run at same priority as disp_thread
-		 * because it is handling frame_done events. A lower priority
-		 * event thread and higher priority disp_thread can causes
-		 * frame_pending counters beyond 2. This can lead to commit
-		 * failure at crtc commit level.
-		 */
 		ret = sched_setscheduler(priv->event_thread[i].thread,
 					 SCHED_FIFO, &param);
 		if (ret)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h
index 0298fa7..0307543 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h
@@ -197,7 +197,6 @@  struct msm_drm_private {
 	unsigned int num_crtcs;
 	struct drm_crtc *crtcs[MAX_CRTCS];
 
-	struct msm_drm_thread disp_thread[MAX_CRTCS];
 	struct msm_drm_thread event_thread[MAX_CRTCS];
 
 	unsigned int num_encoders;

Comments

Sean Paul Dec. 14, 2018, 2:44 p.m.
On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 06:41:43PM -0800, Jeykumar Sankaran wrote:
> Since there are no clients using these threads,
> cleaning it up.
> 
> changes in v2:
> 	- switch all the dependent clients to use system wq
> 	  before removing the disp_threads (Sean Paul)
> changes in v3:
> 	- none
> changes in v4:
> 	- none
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jeykumar Sankaran <jsanka@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c | 35 +----------------------------------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h |  1 -
>  2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 35 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c
> index 37740b8..1e9fec1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c
> @@ -286,13 +286,8 @@ static int msm_drm_uninit(struct device *dev)
>  		kfree(vbl_ev);
>  	}
>  
> -	/* clean up display commit/event worker threads */
> +	/* clean up event worker threads */
>  	for (i = 0; i < priv->num_crtcs; i++) {
> -		if (priv->disp_thread[i].thread) {
> -			kthread_destroy_worker(&priv->disp_thread[i].worker);
> -			priv->disp_thread[i].thread = NULL;
> -		}
> -
>  		if (priv->event_thread[i].thread) {
>  			kthread_destroy_worker(&priv->event_thread[i].worker);
>  			priv->event_thread[i].thread = NULL;
> @@ -545,27 +540,6 @@ static int msm_drm_init(struct device *dev, struct drm_driver *drv)
>  	 */
>  	param.sched_priority = 16;
>  	for (i = 0; i < priv->num_crtcs; i++) {
> -
> -		/* initialize display thread */
> -		priv->disp_thread[i].crtc_id = priv->crtcs[i]->base.id;
> -		kthread_init_worker(&priv->disp_thread[i].worker);
> -		priv->disp_thread[i].dev = ddev;
> -		priv->disp_thread[i].thread =
> -			kthread_run(kthread_worker_fn,
> -				&priv->disp_thread[i].worker,
> -				"crtc_commit:%d", priv->disp_thread[i].crtc_id);
> -		if (IS_ERR(priv->disp_thread[i].thread)) {
> -			DRM_DEV_ERROR(dev, "failed to create crtc_commit kthread\n");
> -			priv->disp_thread[i].thread = NULL;
> -			goto err_msm_uninit;
> -		}
> -
> -		ret = sched_setscheduler(priv->disp_thread[i].thread,
> -					 SCHED_FIFO, &param);
> -		if (ret)
> -			dev_warn(dev, "disp_thread set priority failed: %d\n",
> -				 ret);
> -

I'm getting the following compilation errors with this patch applied to dpu-staging/for-next:

../drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c: In function ‘msm_drm_init’:
../drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c:569:15: error: ‘struct msm_drm_private’ has no member named ‘disp_thread’; did you mean ‘event_thread’?
   if ((!priv->disp_thread[i].thread) ||
               ^~~~~~~~~~~
               event_thread
../drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c:573:15: error: ‘struct msm_drm_private’ has no member named ‘disp_thread’; did you mean ‘event_thread’?
     if (priv->disp_thread[i].thread) {
               ^~~~~~~~~~~
               event_thread
../drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c:575:13: error: ‘struct msm_drm_private’ has no member named ‘disp_thread’; did you mean ‘event_thread’?
       priv->disp_thread[i].thread);
             ^~~~~~~~~~~
             event_thread
../drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c:576:12: error: ‘struct msm_drm_private’ has no member named ‘disp_thread’; did you mean ‘event_thread’?
      priv->disp_thread[i].thread = NULL;
            ^~~~~~~~~~~
            event_thread


I think you also need:

@@ -598,16 +566,9 @@ static int msm_drm_init(struct device *dev, struct drm_driver *drv)
                        priv->event_thread[i].thread = NULL;
                }
 
-               if ((!priv->disp_thread[i].thread) ||
-                               !priv->event_thread[i].thread) {
+               if (!priv->event_thread[i].thread) {
                        /* clean up previously created threads if any */
                        for ( ; i >= 0; i--) {
-                               if (priv->disp_thread[i].thread) {
-                                       kthread_stop(
-                                               priv->disp_thread[i].thread);
-                                       priv->disp_thread[i].thread = NULL;
-                               }
-
                                if (priv->event_thread[i].thread) {
                                        kthread_stop(
                                                priv->event_thread[i].thread);



>  		/* initialize event thread */
>  		priv->event_thread[i].crtc_id = priv->crtcs[i]->base.id;
>  		kthread_init_worker(&priv->event_thread[i].worker);
> @@ -580,13 +554,6 @@ static int msm_drm_init(struct device *dev, struct drm_driver *drv)
>  			goto err_msm_uninit;
>  		}
>  
> -		/**
> -		 * event thread should also run at same priority as disp_thread
> -		 * because it is handling frame_done events. A lower priority
> -		 * event thread and higher priority disp_thread can causes
> -		 * frame_pending counters beyond 2. This can lead to commit
> -		 * failure at crtc commit level.
> -		 */
>  		ret = sched_setscheduler(priv->event_thread[i].thread,
>  					 SCHED_FIFO, &param);
>  		if (ret)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h
> index 0298fa7..0307543 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h
> @@ -197,7 +197,6 @@ struct msm_drm_private {
>  	unsigned int num_crtcs;
>  	struct drm_crtc *crtcs[MAX_CRTCS];
>  
> -	struct msm_drm_thread disp_thread[MAX_CRTCS];
>  	struct msm_drm_thread event_thread[MAX_CRTCS];
>  
>  	unsigned int num_encoders;
> -- 
> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Freedreno mailing list
> Freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/freedreno